emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Any performance loss with radio targets?
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:44:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2r64eop9f.fsf@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59B10B5A-AF4D-4085-9846-0C19EE1D272B@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Wed\, 10 Dec 2008 23\:46\:49 +0100")

Hi Carsten,

Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:

> Hi Matt,
>
> Hundreds or thousands of radio links would be disastrous, direct links
> will work fine.
>
> - Carsten
>

That's what I suspected. Thanks so much for confirming it.

- Matt

> On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:34 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I very much like the convenience of radio targets but was wondering
>> whether an inordinate number of radio targets/links can slow down
>> org-mode as it opens files.
>>
>> I'd like to use internal links to connect notes with their sources.
>>
>> For instance:
>>
>> ----
>>
>> * Auther, Title, Year.
>> <<<AuthorYear>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> * Note
>>
>> "Here is a quote."
>> AuthorYear
>>
>> ----
>>
>> If I plan on having hundreds such links in a file (and perhaps
>> thousands in all my org files), would there be any performance gained
>> by using explicit internal links instead of the radio targets? I.e.,
>>
>> <<AuthorYear>>
>>
>> [[AuthorYear]]
>>
>> I'm assuming the difference would be minimal but would like to confirm
>> this before committing to the first method. Needless to say, it would
>> be easier to convert the second type of links to the first with
>> search/replace than the first to the second.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-11 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-10 20:34 Any performance loss with radio targets? Matthew Lundin
2008-12-10 22:46 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-12-11 12:44   ` Matthew Lundin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2r64eop9f.fsf@fastmail.fm \
    --to=mdl@imapmail.org \
    --cc=dominik@science.uva.nl \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).