emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed

* clocksum and archived trees
@ 2009-03-19 20:12 Jota Pin
  2009-03-19 21:03 ` Peter Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jota Pin @ 2009-03-19 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-orgmode

Dear all,

I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to contribute to 
the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.

I could not find an option for that, is-it implemented?

Thanks,
Jota.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

• * Re: clocksum and archived trees
    2009-03-19 20:12 clocksum and archived trees Jota Pin
  @ 2009-03-19 21:03 ` Peter Jones
    2009-03-20  2:59   ` [Bulk] " Jota Pin
    0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
  From: Peter Jones @ 2009-03-19 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
    To: Jota Pin; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
  
  Jota Pin <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> writes:
  > I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to contribute to 
  > the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
  
  I've been wondering something along the same lines myself.  When
  switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
  time because of archive items.
  
  I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet.  Maybe I'll try to fix
  this tomorrow when I get some time.
  
  -- 
  Peter Jones - 303-669-2637
  pmade inc.  - http://pmade.com
  
  ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

• • * Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees
      2009-03-19 21:03 ` Peter Jones
    @ 2009-03-20  2:59   ` Jota Pin
      2009-03-21 17:21     ` Carsten Dominik
      0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
    From: Jota Pin @ 2009-03-20  2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
      To: Peter Jones; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
    
    Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a écrit :
    > Jota Pin <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> writes:
    > > I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to contribute
    > > to the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
    >
    > I've been wondering something along the same lines myself.  When
    > switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
    > time because of archive items.
    >
    > I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet.  Maybe I'll try to fix
    > this tomorrow when I get some time.
    
    Thanks, this would be great.
    
    Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful:
    
    I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do want to 
    keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes archives tags 
    to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must no count 
    twice there...
    
    Same question for clock tables.
    
    ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

  • • * Re: Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees
        2009-03-20  2:59   ` [Bulk] " Jota Pin
      @ 2009-03-21 17:21     ` Carsten Dominik
        0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
      From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-03-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
        To: Jota Pin; +Cc: Peter Jones, emacs-orgmode
      
      
      On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:59 AM, Jota Pin wrote:
      
      > Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a écrit :
      >> Jota Pin <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> writes:
      >>> I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to  
      >>> contribute
      >>> to the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
      >>
      >> I've been wondering something along the same lines myself.  When
      >> switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
      >> time because of archive items.
      
      
      Hi Peter, this case makes sense, for speed, and I have added
      a variable org-columns-skip-archived-trees, with default t.
      
      >>
      >> I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet.  Maybe I'll try  
      >> to fix
      >> this tomorrow when I get some time.
      >
      > Thanks, this would be great.
      >
      > Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful:
      >
      > I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do  
      > want to
      > keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes  
      > archives tags
      > to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must  
      > no count
      > twice there...
      
      Hi Jota,
      
      for this case I am not sure.  The purpose or archiving is to mark a tree
      as finished, but clearly any clocking times from this tree should still
      contribute.  I see that you are using ARCHIVE to mark a second version
      of a given tree.  If you need multiple versions, why don't you keep
      older versions in another file or so?
      
      Are there more opinions about this?  Maybe I am seeing it wrong.....
      
      - Carsten
      
      
      >
      > Same question for clock tables.
      >
      >
      > _______________________________________________
      > Emacs-orgmode mailing list
      > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
      > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
      > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
      
      ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-21 19:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-19 20:12 clocksum and archived trees Jota Pin
2009-03-19 21:03 ` Peter Jones
2009-03-20  2:59   ` [Bulk] " Jota Pin
2009-03-21 17:21     ` Carsten Dominik

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).