* clocksum and archived trees
@ 2009-03-19 20:12 Jota Pin
2009-03-19 21:03 ` Peter Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jota Pin @ 2009-03-19 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Dear all,
I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to contribute to
the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
I could not find an option for that, is-it implemented?
Thanks,
Jota.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: clocksum and archived trees
2009-03-19 20:12 clocksum and archived trees Jota Pin
@ 2009-03-19 21:03 ` Peter Jones
2009-03-20 2:59 ` [Bulk] " Jota Pin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Jones @ 2009-03-19 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jota Pin; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Jota Pin <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> writes:
> I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to contribute to
> the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
I've been wondering something along the same lines myself. When
switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
time because of archive items.
I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet. Maybe I'll try to fix
this tomorrow when I get some time.
--
Peter Jones - 303-669-2637
pmade inc. - http://pmade.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees
2009-03-19 21:03 ` Peter Jones
@ 2009-03-20 2:59 ` Jota Pin
2009-03-21 17:21 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jota Pin @ 2009-03-20 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Jones; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a écrit :
> Jota Pin <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> writes:
> > I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to contribute
> > to the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
>
> I've been wondering something along the same lines myself. When
> switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
> time because of archive items.
>
> I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet. Maybe I'll try to fix
> this tomorrow when I get some time.
Thanks, this would be great.
Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful:
I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do want to
keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes archives tags
to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must no count
twice there...
Same question for clock tables.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees
2009-03-20 2:59 ` [Bulk] " Jota Pin
@ 2009-03-21 17:21 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-03-21 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jota Pin; +Cc: Peter Jones, emacs-orgmode
On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:59 AM, Jota Pin wrote:
> Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a écrit :
>> Jota Pin <jotapin2005@yahoo.fr> writes:
>>> I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to
>>> contribute
>>> to the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
>>
>> I've been wondering something along the same lines myself. When
>> switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
>> time because of archive items.
Hi Peter, this case makes sense, for speed, and I have added
a variable org-columns-skip-archived-trees, with default t.
>>
>> I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet. Maybe I'll try
>> to fix
>> this tomorrow when I get some time.
>
> Thanks, this would be great.
>
> Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful:
>
> I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do
> want to
> keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes
> archives tags
> to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must
> no count
> twice there...
Hi Jota,
for this case I am not sure. The purpose or archiving is to mark a tree
as finished, but clearly any clocking times from this tree should still
contribute. I see that you are using ARCHIVE to mark a second version
of a given tree. If you need multiple versions, why don't you keep
older versions in another file or so?
Are there more opinions about this? Maybe I am seeing it wrong.....
- Carsten
>
> Same question for clock tables.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-21 19:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-19 20:12 clocksum and archived trees Jota Pin
2009-03-19 21:03 ` Peter Jones
2009-03-20 2:59 ` [Bulk] " Jota Pin
2009-03-21 17:21 ` Carsten Dominik
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).