From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: [feature request] More flexible repeats Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:29:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4E7E445C.3090203@raingods.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7tkI-00038f-3a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:48:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7tkG-0001zU-P8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:48:10 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:40329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7tkG-0001zQ-Ik for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:48:08 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7tkD-0007ft-Ey for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:48:05 +0200 Received: from c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([98.215.105.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:48:05 +0200 Received: from jwiegley by c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:48:05 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Michael Steeves writes: > If I have something that I want to track in terms of consistency, and want > to do it during the weekdays, is there a way I could express that other then > having a series of 5 habits, one for each day of the week, each one of which > would repeat every week? The best answer I have for that is to schedule the habit with a daily repeat, and then just check it off for the weekend days when it doesn't apply. Then you're being consistent, it's just that "done" doesn't necessarily mean that you physically did something. John