From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: http://www.todotxt.org/ Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:33:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87wssyb4s1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IpmxZ-00044T-RY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:36:53 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IpmxY-00042v-J7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:36:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpmxY-00042i-BV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:36:52 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IpmxX-0000aw-SI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:36:52 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipmx8-0005xM-Tw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:36:26 +0000 Received: from accountslaptop.gradunion.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.92.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:36:26 +0000 Received: from sdl.web by accountslaptop.gradunion.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:36:26 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2007-11-04 11:59 +0000, Bastien wrote: > Leo writes: > >> I came across www.todotxt.org and it looks like another good >> application for managing todo (or applying GTD methodology). > > Interesting. Did you already use/test it? > >> It is also based on text file. > > Yes, text files are powerful. What strikes me is that in both cases > (Org/todotxt) there seem to be a large community using them. > > See the discussion at lifehacker: > > http://tinyurl.com/2g4c43 > > Another thing: when quickly reviewing the website, I couldn't figure out > how timestamp and deadlines where handled. It seems there is a hack for > this (see the comments of the discussion above) but I don't know if it's > a builtin now. That would be quite a shortcoming I guess. I haven't used it yet. But I am very impressed by its todo reporter. http://www.todotxt.org/library/birdseye.py/ The ascii report looks clean. I'd wonder if there is something similar in org.el. It is the best way to supervise how well we are doing with projects. Best, -- .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :. Use the most powerful email client -- http://gnus.org/