From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: org-agenda-ignore-scheduled not taken into account in custom agenda blocks? Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:28:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871ufu8gvz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TatUo-0006Mi-Gw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:28:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TatUk-000802-5A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:28:34 -0500 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:26685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TatUj-0007yZ-UY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:28:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:12:27 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: Eric Abrahamsen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Samuel Wales writes: > Partly to avoid trouble like this, I use the general search instead of > the specialized ones. What are those general searches? > On 11/20/12, Alan Schmitt wrote: >> I decided to dig into this, and it's not a bug. One should set: >> >> (setq org-agenda-tags-todo-honor-ignore-options t) >> >> The trick was that these blocks were tag searches. > > Then the variable should not apply. Bug? No: "todo" customization do not apply to "tag" searches, and a "tag-todo" search is actually a "tag" search. The org-agenda-tags-todo-honor-ignore-options variable says that "todo" customizations should apply to "tag" searches. Or I just misunderstood everything and got it to work by mistake ;-) Alan