From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: mentioning EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER in the latex header info node Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:33:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87o9o2ueex.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFd26-0006E7-23 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 04:33:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFd22-0001u1-W2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 04:33:58 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:29081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFd22-0001pL-JX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 04:33:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87o9o2ueex.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:00:54 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-11-16 22:00, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> The LaTeX header and sectioning structure info node talks about >> LATEX_HEADER and LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA. Maybe it could mention the EXPORT >> version as well, as is done for the LATEX_CLASS_OPTION. > > Since adding "EXPORT_" prefixed version of all keywords could be > overwhelming, I'd rather do it the other way and remove > EXPORT_LATEX_CLASS_OPTION reference. We could consider that all is said > in the last paragraph of (info "(org)Export settings"). > > WDYT? It makes sense. Reading the text there, I'm a bit surprised: For example, `DATE' and `EXPORT_FILE_NAME' keywords become, respectively, `EXPORT_DATE' and `EXPORT_FILE_NAME'. Is the `EXPORT_FILE_NAME' a real example (i.e., a node property that has a global and subtree meaning with the same name)? Alan =2D-=20 OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Monthly Athmospheric CO=E2=82=82, Mauna Loa Obs. 2017-10: 403.64, 2016-10: = 401.57 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE6lXof/BsSVW56ZmGBA0KO07S5ccFAloOrP4ACgkQBA0KO07S 5cfyjggAmfNMyDhDDGr4gLfxQjK1NwiGpdiwKIjHXEdYe3PVR1rDHl6paMwvn4M5 JgU9JeiHr+Sy67pxOytLILc4Mn5NA4wIEDfUlaxQr1eeL7Zdw/xJwiMkfbLUZUWk /G9i/s70ACeU/ajLtKiTs7yN9wwLiGhKWQZ2cyydZzAX8/od4TrodoF9j1CyKIDE qIeecJwgIt2+LAVKaTHyqHc/7xebhKa5EsLSAuoOQ3Yrr0JP9IHWcEb0Bf8jv1D9 iSXZ1V76Pc9YzJzjJMDMXOK56KpyojycbEsZo2I1zab5Or6kBPpnw8EXlTdkq0Ct 5rmlY1N/GxM54N+JvhjKcLFK/zzK1w== =H/L2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--