From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: Gnus link BUGS Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 11:48:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87mz5g61kl.fsf@tallis.lumiere.ens.fr> <87r6uqf6zh.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk> <87y7oxu1sx.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GyRqE-0005Tn-BS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 06:48:34 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GyRqB-0005Rt-TF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 06:48:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GyRqB-0005Rj-Kr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 06:48:31 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GyRqA-00017k-UX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 06:48:31 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GyRpq-00066Z-CB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 12:48:10 +0100 Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 12:48:10 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 12:48:10 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org * Bastien (2006-12-24 09:37 +0100) said: ^^^^^^^ >> I'd suggest drop gnus-fetch-group and use gnus-group-read-group so >> that it will work in Gnus 5.11 as well. gnus-group-select-group >> should also be dropped. It will interrupt user when the group is >> too big. > > That's fine for me. BTW, i think it's okay *not* to select the > group when we jump to it in the group buffer. Agreed ;) -- Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)