Scott Randby writes: > On 01/22/2015 05:02 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > >> Now the question is: what is the most appropriate place to *inform* >> about his project. If not the Org-mode discussion list, I really don't >> know. (I assume that nobody denies his *right* to license his work >> according to his wishes, of course, for if not, another explanation >> would be that this project doesn't have any right to *exist* in the >> first place.) > > Since we cannot view the code of this software, then we have no way of > determining before we use it if it has any purpose other than its > stated purpose. For all we know, it contains some nasty code that > takes over your system and deletes all of your files or worse. > > To trust this software because the developer seems to have good > intentions is foolish. When I saw the announcement, I interpreted it > as saying this: "Gee, here is some neat software I wrote. You can't > see the code, but trust me, I'm good. I'll open up part of the code > maybe sometime, but for now you can try it out for free. I'm not going > to cut you off later and make you pay to continue using this wonderful > thing. And no, it doesn't do anything bad like steal information or > trash systems. Trust me." No thanks, I say. Promote this somewhere > else. I just want to state here that not everybody feels the same as you. Cheers, Rainer > > Scott Randby > > -- Rainer M. Krug email: Rainerkrugsde PGP: 0x0F52F982