From: Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Multiple (identical) RESULTS blocks of one code block?
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:02:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2mw3l1ayl.fsf@krugs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d24hmx2i.fsf@gmail.com> (Aaron Ecay's message of "Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:05:38 -0300")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1912 bytes --]
Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> 2015ko martxoak 9an, Rainer M Krug-ek idatzi zuen:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Consider the following:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> * The calculation
>> #+NAME: testcode :exports both
>
> It looks like you’ve tried to put a header argument into the name. Is
> it merely an accident? I ask because...
Accident - the header argument should be behind the code block beginning
and not the NAME - sorry.
>
>> #+begin_src R :session test
>> runif(10)
>> #+end_src
>>
>>
>> * summary of the results
>> First time
>> #+RESULTS: testcode :exports both
>> | 0.772744940361008 |
>> | 0.170518629485741 |
>> | 0.0833237133920193 |
>> | 0.149035625392571 |
>> | 0.698798568220809 |
>> | 0.627075897762552 |
>> | 0.177144371205941 |
>> | 0.0476319056469947 |
>> | 0.289851602632552 |
>> | 0.0296813279855996 |
>>
>> * and another
>> testthingy
>> #+RESULTS: testcode :exports both
>
> ...here it reoccurs, in identical format. This is fine, interpreted
> as just a weird block name (and not as an actual header argument).
> But if you’re trying to allow the header arguments to vary for the two
> result blocks I don’t think it will be very nice. (It would require
> re-evaluating the code block for each different combination of header
> arguments, which would give unexpected behavior in the case of side
> effects, etc. etc.)
I think I clud do this by using =#+CALL testcode= but this is not w=hat
I wanted.
>
> Maybe it’s not very important, but I just figured I’d ask for
> clarification.
Sure - I should be looking more carefully when typing.
Is my brain really that slow, as I am not a fast typer...
Cheers,
Rainer
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Aaron Ecay
>
>
--
Rainer M. Krug
email: Rainer<at>krugs<dot>de
PGP: 0x0F52F982
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 494 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 10:04 Multiple (identical) RESULTS blocks of one code block? Rainer M Krug
2015-03-09 13:01 ` John Kitchin
2015-03-09 13:10 ` Sebastien Vauban
2015-03-10 9:06 ` Rainer M Krug
2015-03-10 9:35 ` Rainer M Krug
[not found] ` <m2sidd2ems.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu>
2015-03-10 13:31 ` Rainer M Krug
2015-03-10 13:57 ` Rainer M Krug
2015-03-09 16:34 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-10 2:05 ` Aaron Ecay
2015-03-10 9:02 ` Rainer M Krug [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2mw3l1ayl.fsf@krugs.de \
--to=rainer@krugs.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).