From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: Two bugs Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:43:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9d6b6efbd81deb17ae0ac5b47ed4c2b8@science.uva.nl> <0a934958eb97965702f067ca0119c275@science.uva.nl> <26dcf9dff4f8f288c9c25a768690ac40@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Htok9-0004RR-RG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:47:25 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Htok7-0004RF-FP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:47:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htok7-0004RC-9t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:47:23 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Htok6-00054V-J7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:47:22 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Htoil-0007WT-E5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2007 19:45:59 +0200 Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 19:45:59 +0200 Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 19:45:59 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org ----- Carsten Dominik (2007-05-31) wrote:----- >>>> It is also INCONVENIENT when each top level has a lot of level 2 >>>> entries. For example when you are looking at a subtree and suddenly >>>> want to see an overview of the document, you often want to get back >>>> to the original subtree after visibility cycling. > > However, we agreed that the cursor should be moved to a visible > location. This means that it will be in a top-level headline after > cycling through overview. Agree. > Are you saying that you would prefer to keep the cursor exactly at its > position? Or maybe I should push a mark before switching to > overview... The behavior in outline-mode seems desirable. i.e. if the cursor is original inside a body of a headline when the body is hided the cursor should stay in that headline. The principle is trying to minimize the movement of the cursor. -- Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)