From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: Bad doc [7.4]
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:06:48 -0900
Message-ID: <m2lj3kkgvb.wl%dave@boostpro.com>
References: <m2r5ddj7lc.wl%dave@boostpro.com>
	<03A952A4-467F-45B8-A668-8991218D6E2A@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53838 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PUalo-0005Wm-P5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:07:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dave@boostpro.com>) id 1PUaln-00042f-7b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:07:00 -0500
Received: from mail-iw0-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:34757)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dave@boostpro.com>) id 1PUaln-00042D-2P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:06:59 -0500
Received: by iwn41 with SMTP id 41so1198083iwn.6
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:06:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <03A952A4-467F-45B8-A668-8991218D6E2A@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

At Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:40:50 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> 
> This is a bit tricky and not fully documented.
> 
> If you have no or only only a single template defined, then
> template selection is bypassed and you do not get a chance
> to press C to get to the customization buffer.  This is to
> please John Wiegley :) who only uses a single capture template

And I'm using his template, practically unmodified :-)

> and rightfully wanted to lose the extra key press.  

And I like that feature myself.

> As soon
> as you have at least 2 templates, you will get the menu and
> also the chance to press `C'.
> 
> I am not quite sure what to do about it, documenting it makes
> things look more complicated as they are.

Hmm, seems to me that it would be more principled to have org-capture
take an optional argument that indicates the template index, and ask
me and John to bind our key to (lambda () (org-capture 0))

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com