From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Moritz Ulrich Subject: Re: Differences between MobileOrg and MobileOrgNG Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:57:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5055FB14.5050901@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDIAY-0006rJ-Dz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:58:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDIAX-000486-Ip for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:58:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:63154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDIAX-00047z-CV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:58:05 -0400 Received: by eeke49 with SMTP id e49so3630141eek.0 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:58:03 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <5055FB14.5050901@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Laurent Hoeltgen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Laurent Hoeltgen writes: > Hi, > > I noticed today, that there are two apps for org-mode on android, namely= =20 > MobileOrg and MobileOrgNG. > > Is there any significant difference between them in terms of=20 > functionality and stability? Is any of them to be recommended over the=20 > other one? As far as I know, MobileOrg is the original implementation where NG was forked from. When I started using org-mobile, I used the NG version, but switched to the 'original' version where development is more active. However, I really prefer the NG user interface over normal MobileOrg's. It feels more modern and better integrated to Android 4.0. (Though it's not perfect) I'd really like to improve the look of MobileOrg itself, but I really can't get myself to program in java. > So far, I've been using MobileOrg and it worked for me. > > Regards, > Laurent =2D-=20 Moritz Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQVgUYAAoJEKUFGO1Zs0thkKAH/09BJSElPVlcKqXE9lF2DMgZ J4f/7uqSD1/BejVSvQnR35x1rVi8jM63BlD+dOH4QDomzg4gNrDEpl+jJXLdhNzL BjQAUqp8HQUokVK74NdHCJJRdg+ZXIHmDEaCKRve1s0O8oVisBMN6CvKuQATT7Wx Y8hi3iR6ir0lhGedhcNhwB42zx7szGLME+gmJzdvaKXLgocHDSd5dPJTkGSsHkKA 4O5ZdtFcYGoEF0CeK9Z4W4P1uTz75PV1Og5BcT9DsVM9AlhG7YPLHhNBnhj3E23M IPvLGcq/PByWa8Htbr3v24qa6CZypP80T/7jm86GFUHDQntj8rF1lXPAsvH4X50= =Le9f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--