From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Subject: Re: ocaml babel no longer works?
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:40:16 +0100
Message-ID: <m2liarcpi7.fsf@polytechnique.org>
References: <m2bobuhokl.fsf@polytechnique.org>
	<m2zjzdg08b.fsf@polytechnique.org> <876221i41q.fsf@gmail.com>
	<m2pq064kaq.fsf@polytechnique.org> <87vc9wtc55.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41933)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1U5tQg-0006Ps-Kg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:40:28 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1U5tQe-0004wx-8b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:40:26 -0500
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:35912)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1U5tQe-0004v5-2Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:40:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <87vc9wtc55.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Eric,

Eric Schulte writes:

>> The suggestion: instead of appending '"org-babel-ocaml-eoe";;' to the
>> code, how simply put ';;' (which will make sure everything is flushed)
>> then detect the toplevel is done by seeing the string '# ' at the
>> beginning of the line? Would there be an issue with the fact that this
>> line does not have a newline? If so, an alternative suggestion would be
>> to use the longer ';; "org-babel-ocaml-eoe";;' which makes sure the
>> phrase in the input won't interact with the marker.
>>
>
> You can customize the `org-babel-ocaml-eoe-output' and
> `org-babel-ocaml-eoe-indicator' variables so that they match the above.
> If this proves generally useful then I'd be happy to admit this change
> to the core.

I'll have a look at it (as soon as my European grant deadline as
passed). The one thing I don't know about org-babel-comint-with-output
is the following: what does it do with the last line if it does not have
a carriage return? (After running a command, the toplevel outputs '# '
with no carriage return. Will it be part of the returned string?)

> I hope these pointers are useful.

They definitely are. As ocaml is not only my language of choice but one
I have the chance of teaching, I'll clearly look into this.

Thanks again,

Alan