From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thomas S. Dye" Subject: Re: function for inserting a block Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:24:34 -1000 Message-ID: References: <877exghblx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2uoc4q7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bmllk5xy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878tgmwwsa.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po9q2e8k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvyyvpst.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuaiz069.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lgk9eo4d.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fuahxxvs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r2u1cuwj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87infdctzq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1zsbizs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k1zp4rxj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871slx4j6p.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87376btslq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vaj7oyxb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871sl9ow44.fsf@gnu.org> <87fu9pgfkj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87375ouanr.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCV28-00084p-9P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:25:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCV25-0002WP-4i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:25:04 -0500 Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.38.55]:53423) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCV24-0002US-Uj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:25:01 -0500 Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DF11408C4 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:24:49 -0700 (MST) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: "Berry, Charles" Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" , Rasmus Berry, Charles writes: >> On Nov 8, 2017, at 6:07 AM, Rasmus wrote: >> >> I think the template expansion a la "> YASnippet installed for many years, and I never figured out how to use it >> properly. To me, it is a bit too complex a replacement. > > > Me too. " > I suspect that there will be cries of pain and anger from others who have not tuned in to this thread if it is removed. > > Chuck Agreed. It would be great if backward compatibility could be maintained. I use (org-try-structure-completion) all the time. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com