From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Helm <nick@tenpoint.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates
 thru e.g. "<s[TAB]")
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 23:57:11 +1200
Message-ID: <m2lgd3wpuw.fsf@tenpoint.co.nz>
References: <87lgd671k7.fsf@bzg.fr> <87o9i2p9qq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49349)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@tenpoint.co.nz>) id 1fDTuP-0003fr-85
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 07:57:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@tenpoint.co.nz>) id 1fDTuM-0005iY-7k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 07:57:25 -0400
Received: from mail-sy3aus01on0103.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([104.47.117.103]:41216
	helo=AUS01-SY3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <nick@tenpoint.co.nz>) id 1fDTuL-0005gG-Ib
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 07:57:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2018
	13:05:20 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 at 23:05:20 +1200, Bastien wrote:

> I may be wrong in thinking disabling this will cause trouble to
> many users.  Let's just take a moment to see what users think.

I vote to drop "<s" and adopt the new mechanism by default. "<s" always
seemed a bit off to me. Convenient, yes, but rather counterintuitive.

And besides, what is org doing in the templating business anyway?
Doesn't this fall into the category of "basic infrastructure that Emacs
should provide to all modes"?