From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Lundin Subject: Re: Tagging a region of text without creating a branch Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:40:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r5tc919n.wl@imapmail.org> <426ABD01-2F97-4F67-BC37-96C079DF94FC@gmail.com> <96F16419-FA3F-4C33-899B-1C79C0CC840F@gmail.com> <63255A67-9D91-414F-AEBB-B3D6D12015D1@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MxL8b-0001W5-AM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:40:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MxL8W-0001Ra-IC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:40:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52682 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MxL8W-0001RL-9s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:40:28 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:57562) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MxL8V-0007JR-UX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:40:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <63255A67-9D91-414F-AEBB-B3D6D12015D1@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:27:37 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Matt Lundin , Org Mode List Carsten Dominik writes: > On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Matt Lundin wrote: > >> At Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:29:05 +0200, >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 10, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Matt Lundin wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Carsten, >>>> >>>> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes, this should now work. Good catch. >>>>> >>>>> You method with the tag on the END line would even be harmful, as >>>>> it >>>>> removes any text after the END line, up to the next heading. >>>>> >>>>> Can you show me the use case for not exporting inline tasks? >>>>> Maybe I >>>>> need to bring that variable back, if there is a good case for >>>>> it.... >>>> >>>> Now that I am doing more of my writing in org-mode, I plan to use >>>> inline tasks for marking up my drafts with TODOs. These reminders >>>> would be "for my eyes only." When I publish the draft to LaTeX or >>>> html >>>> for sharing, I would thus prefer that the inline tasks be excluded. >>> >>> OK, I have re-introduced the variable org-inlinetask-export, as a >>> Boolean. Do we need to be able to set this on a per-file basis? >> >> Thanks Carsten! An option to set per-file would indeed be nice. For >> instance, if I'm working on an article, I might want to share one >> version of it without visible inline tasks/comments and another with >> them. >> >> That said, I suppose I could use local variables to do this. > > Local variables will not work, but #+BIND will. > > I guess this will be enough.... Absolutely! Thanks again, Matt