From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com>
Subject: Re: ox-tufte-latex
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 06:07:56 -1000
Message-ID: <m2k2mleq03.fsf@tsdye.com>
References: <m2h9hsgdo2.fsf@tsdye.com> <87lh72k57t.fsf@gmx.us>
	<m2si1aeft6.fsf@tsdye.com> <87si1ayrxm.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87twlqc9wb.fsf@mbork.pl> <87d1seyqar.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87si19dikj.fsf@mbork.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42772)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1aQzyd-0006o6-By
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:08:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1aQzyZ-0000o6-BO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:08:19 -0500
Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.33.93]:43392)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>)
	id 1aQzyZ-0000o1-4V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:08:15 -0500
In-reply-to: <87si19dikj.fsf@mbork.pl>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>

Aloha Marcin,

Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:

> On 2016-02-03, at 12:41, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> wrote:
>
>> Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
>>
>>> On 2016-02-03, at 12:05, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> Marginnotes.  I don’t think we have a concept like this.  I 
>>>> guess  
>>> 
>>> Inline todos? 
>>
>> It's not really the same.  Inline todos are for temporary notes 
>> (say bugs in your document) that you’d not want to keep in your 
>> final document, I guess.
>
> Well, this is more or less what I would use marginnotes for...  See
> e.g. https://www.ctan.org/pkg/todonotes .

Tufte uses marginnotes to communicate with a reader.  I think inline
todos and the todonotes package you linked are intended to communicate
with an author.  It might be well to keep that distinction.

All the best,
Tom

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com