From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: Bug: [patch] Fixes behavior of org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer [7.8.02 (release_7.7.796.gc512)] Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:43:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87pqd3us27.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1NX7-0006Xk-55 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:43:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1NWX-0007Oo-Eo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:43:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:59202) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1NWX-0007Oi-AH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:43:17 -0500 Received: by qafl39 with SMTP id l39so82619qaf.0 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:43:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:34:22 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Maus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org on Sat Feb 25 2012, Dave Abrahams wrote: > on Sat Feb 25 2012, David Maus wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000, >> Dave Abrahams wrote: >>> >>> [1 ] >>> >>> >>> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and >>> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See >>> >>> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback >>> >>> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list. >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> This function was misbehaving in a number of ways. The enclosed patch >>> represents the changes necessary to make it work properly, accumulated >>> over several weeks of testing. Sorry if the description is a bit vague. >> >> Thanks for the patch. I implemented the first to modifications (handle >> org-last-indirect-buffer being nil and window-live-p >> indirect-window). > > Sorry, I can't parse that last sentence, and as a result I'm having > trouble understanding the rest of the message. > >> These were indeed bugs or glitches. >> >> The third modification (set visibility according to property) is a new >> feature. Currently org-tree-to-indirect buffer does not use the >> VISIBILITY property but it makes sense to me to do so. Well, new feature or not, org-tree-to-indirect-buffer stopped behaving correctly for me when it was added, and I had to make adjustments. >> I'll check this out and see to implement this. Thanks. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com