From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] [ODT] Annotations break paragraphs
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:40:45 +0100
Message-ID: <m2hajv29yq.fsf@christianmoe.com>
References: <m2vc8kjvud.fsf@christianmoe.com> <871ub3o6mn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<m2wqsvbgqv.fsf@christianmoe.com> <87ip4f9zqa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<m2vc8fntaw.fsf@christianmoe.com> <87r4j35ejb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<87ip4fxh1e.fsf@gmail.com> <m2obe6wlfr.fsf@christianmoe.com>
	<87y5d8ean2.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60756)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1UL8Mq-0007OV-Ai
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:39:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1UL8Mj-0004Fw-CZ
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:39:28 -0400
Received: from mail2.b1.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.205]:54739)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1UL8Mj-0004FQ-5s
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:39:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <87y5d8ean2.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>, Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> Minor cosmetic annoyance: An extra space is inserted
>> before the annotation.
>>
>> Pending the introduction of a dedicated syntax, could we have this fix
>> in master please?
>
> Sure, but, if it's not too much work, I'd like the extra space removed
> first. Do you have an idea about the XML reason behind this?

Yes, there's a newline inserted before the opening <office:annotation>
tag. I guess that since it's inside a <text:p> tag, it gets interpreted
as whitespace that's part of the text, and collapsed to a space. But the
newline is only there to make the XML more readable, so it's expendable.

Sorry, I really could have taken the ten minutes to investigate that
before my previous message.

Yours,
Christian