From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: Bug: [patch] Fixes behavior of org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer [7.8.02 (release_7.7.796.gc512)] Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:34:22 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87pqd3us27.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1Hlf-00047n-Rj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:34:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1HlY-0004Fw-5N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:34:31 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:37066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1HlY-0004Fo-1H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:34:24 -0500 Received: by qauh8 with SMTP id h8so849367qau.0 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:34:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pqd3us27.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:26:57 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Maus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org on Sat Feb 25 2012, David Maus wrote: > Hi Dave, > > At Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:13 -1000, > Dave Abrahams wrote: >> >> [1 ] >> >> >> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and >> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See >> >> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback >> >> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> This function was misbehaving in a number of ways. The enclosed patch >> represents the changes necessary to make it work properly, accumulated >> over several weeks of testing. Sorry if the description is a bit vague. > > Thanks for the patch. I implemented the first to modifications (handle > org-last-indirect-buffer being nil and window-live-p > indirect-window). Sorry, I can't parse that last sentence, and as a result I'm having trouble understanding the rest of the message. > These were indeed bugs or glitches. > > The third modification (set visibility according to property) is a new > feature. Currently org-tree-to-indirect buffer does not use the > VISIBILITY property but it makes sense to me to do so. > > I'll check this out and see to implement this. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com