From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4] Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:52:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wqqusder.fsf@pank.eu> <87ip2esccc.fsf@pank.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeSNf-0005oQ-7V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:52:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeSNa-0001r1-Tq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:52:11 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:62457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeSNa-0001qq-Nj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:52:06 -0400 In-reply-to: <87ip2esccc.fsf@pank.eu> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: n.goaziou@gmail.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, papoanaya@hotmail.com Hello again, Rasmus writes: > This is probably the most fun change. It adds special tags PS, ENCL, > CC, AFTER_CLOSING as in my last patch set, but it uses heading this > time. E.g. ENCLs are under the heading * ENCL :ENCL:. This was > suggested by Nicolas, and it's nicer. The ideas comes from > ox-groff.el file=B9. Thanks Luis! This is great, thanks. I'd like to have the opinion of others on the code, but I very much welcome this change. > One thing I'd like to discuss is whether to adopt headings for TO and > FROM also. The Groff exporter already does so for it's letters. The > main benefit is that it allows for org-syntax. IMO it's a lot nicer > to look at as well. Check the org-groff site in the footnote for an > example. > > I'd be happy to look into this the next time I have a free day for > programming if you guys (also) find in a more appealing. (One > additional benefit would be that for simple documents it wouldn't > matter whether groff or scrlttr2 was used as backend). This would be very helpful indeed. Alan