From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: function for cleaning org-attach directories Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:04:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <877fq0o4xx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87d1zs46jm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87vbdjico8.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874ml2f9ce.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHCb7-0000Mq-FS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:03:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHCb0-0005m1-Ex for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:03:17 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:36372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHCb0-0005la-9I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:03:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874ml2f9ce.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:11:45 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015-07-18 05:11, Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> I gave this a try and it seems that `org-attach-directory' needs to be >> defined for it to work. I'm surprised because I never configured this >> and with gnorb I have had files attached using org-attach. Does gnorb >> use a default value for this? > > Gnorb has calls to (require 'org-attach) in certain places -- unless > you've loaded and used gnorb in your current session, you'll probably > want to require that yourself. Ah, yes, of course. It seems to be working, but it=E2=80=99s awfully silent= . It would be great if it gave some feedback (I don=E2=80=99t know if it actually deleted anything, as there was nothing in the *Messages* buffer). Alan =2D-=20 OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Last week athmospheric CO=E2=82=82 average (Updated July 14, 2015, Mauna Lo= a Obs.): 401.73 ppm --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVrQ3iAAoJEAQNCjtO0uXHZ6sIAKEyCTM5/fbk/XskezXZaHm6 2ooiKElMkXhtcwOZ3DDnBhiUxHMnAi6cr/gW8oQyABp0JO0ybYfxaYvCbhXxJYxM h4nGF0GUQYsmsmidnoLCoW0/Gc8dJysGev4P8A5/SdRTTtK/fqbu/Pph0pnettUG 7znXlL+4rmZYOso+DyAvTPrPR4RwtbslHVZzScDD7q+TpTbmNH5AkgAAx5hDZ8mT kPRhLMQK1gEAB456qyPcQVu4RK91zLcVOWYxZOi79/zbpf0GzV1MUnqMvZKEi+hf 7LKeFsivFu5GJGLqyRcSO5kJVgotzmqjlmQvTxBtvPksVnxb19+5gGTtaClywSA= =EwNX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--