From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: [babel] noweb does not work (as expected) Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:33:06 -0700 Message-ID: References: <200911091247.48775.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> <200911091616.56653.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> <87hbt3n0q7.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <200911101051.39479.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7jLy-0002vK-9E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:33:18 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7jLs-0002us-M0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:33:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46466 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7jLs-0002uj-Ib for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:33:12 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.217.224]:46936) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7jLs-00069S-8w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:33:12 -0500 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so7017124gxk.6 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:33:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200911101051.39479.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> (Torsten Wagner's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:51:39 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Torsten Wagner Cc: Dan Davison , Org Mode Mailing List Torsten Wagner writes: >> I think the main point is that the current set up means that org-mode >> and org-babel share a common history of commits. My current idea of git >> submodules is that I would include something as a submodule when it is a >> module that gets used by multiple different projects... > > As far as I understand git submodules (but I never get in real use to > them yet) they can be considered as a part of a project which keeps it > own history. If that is right it might be perfect for org-mode and > org-babel. You can develop on top of the org-mode git and does not > cluttering the history of org- mode git. However, as far as I read > there are some potential flaws which, if used wrong, can create some > serious problems. > Hi Torsten, Having used git submodules in a couple of projects I would shy away from the added complexity which submodules introduce. In my experience the implicit requirement of submodules for users to execute 'git submodule init' and 'git submodule update' commands whenever they update their source code can lead to a lot of confusion. Best -- Eric