Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:

> Rainer M Krug writes:
>> If this is the case, I would opt, in addition to the + operator, to
>> have a - operator, which *removes* properties from the property set
>> :header-args.
>
> Properties don't work that way, they're just strings.

So the + adds a string to the end of the inherited (or before defined)
string - correct? If this is the case, the same property can be
mwentioned in the :header-qrgs string? 

>
>> Initially I thought, to use :header-args+ instead of :header-args would
>> work, but I was wrong (see below).
>
> It's supposed to work, but doesn't due to a bug in the property API.

OK - good to know.

Rainer

>
>
> Regards,
> Achim.

-- 
Rainer M. Krug
email: Rainer<at>krugs<dot>de
PGP: 0x0F52F982