From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: relative scheduling Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:32:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <3jve9n6oxf.fsf@home.net> <29178d4ffee1d1d7a249c67ca0592b65@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfLlH-0001zB-TV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:33:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfLlG-0001xv-H0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:33:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfLlG-0001xd-28 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:33:02 -0400 Received: from johnwiegley.com ([208.70.150.153] helo=mail.johnwiegley.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IfLlF-0002cp-PZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:33:01 -0400 Received: from Hermes.local (unknown [72.22.154.84]) by mail.johnwiegley.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E639A4224DC for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:33:00 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <29178d4ffee1d1d7a249c67ca0592b65@science.uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue\, 9 Oct 2007 18\:09\:08 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > - A good reason to make it relative to today is that you might not always > know that the entry is already scheduled. Using today as reference would be > safe > > - A good reason for doing it relative to the scheduled date is that you are > *re*-scheduling, and then it is a bit more logical to think "lets push this > two days down" I vote for relative to the current day, since I prefer to think in terms of "days from now". John