From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Subject: Re: Wrapped links with long descriptions
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:39:10 -0500
Message-ID: <m2bpitfp29.fsf@fastmail.fm>
References: <87zl6e4b7a.fsf@fastmail.fm>
	<45A819D3-5A44-427A-9C8F-44224BD46AA6@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NCXGJ-0004jb-Ug
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:39:20 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NCXGE-0004ee-Pq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:39:18 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53624 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCXGE-0004eR-F1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:39:14 -0500
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:38269)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1NCXGE-00063b-4Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:39:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <45A819D3-5A44-427A-9C8F-44224BD46AA6@gmail.com> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:33:31 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>, Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Matt,
>
> yes.  The fact that this has not been reported earlier shows that this
> is not a frequent case.
>
> Fixed now, 2 lines are now allowed.  Is that enough?

Yes, I believe two should be enough. Thanks!

- Matt