From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martyn Jago Subject: Re: [babel] Collection of code block snippets Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:15:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <878vq48dvt.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkiiq4ko.fsf@gmail.com> <87bouxr3v1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Mef-0002cp-Ky for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:15:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Mee-0001jx-H5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:15:21 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Mee-0001jm-Bp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:15:20 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Mec-0002Dj-F3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:15:18 +0200 Received: from 88-96-171-142.dsl.zen.co.uk ([88.96.171.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:15:18 +0200 Received: from martyn.jago by 88-96-171-142.dsl.zen.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:15:18 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Eric Eric Schulte writes: [...] > > I just made three small changes to the testing framework so it is now > possible to run the test suite in batch mode with the following. > > emacs -Q --batch -l path/to/org/testing/org-test.el --eval "(setq org-confirm-babel-evaluate nil)" -f org-test-run-all-tests Great idea - unfortunately its not quite working for me since I get four failing tests. In addition I have no (easy) indication of which four tests are failing since the backtrace is just the output of the tests working (no backtrace for failed tests). This is what I like about the ert-run-batch commands - you get an indication and summary of tests passed, and the backtrace of any failures. Also, I mentioned that ert-batch.el and ert-run.el are not part of Emacs. This is actually because their contents were merged into ert.el within Emacs. Regards Martyn > > Best -- Eric