From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Kitchin Subject: Re: Citations, continued Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:14:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d04780.cb58460a.5243.2603@mx.google.com> <87h9v3li8t.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d078ff.b044440a.06ec.3cf6@mx.google.com> <87d25rkmag.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d1bc7b.c57d440a.3c5d.2dca@mx.google.com> <87vbjh284z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4tk4m7.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87oap7z664.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvaibr3k.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4o9s5qc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d25kpxap.fsf@pank.eu> <87k2zsso3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbjcoewx.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnl4shqg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h9uwwmgt.fsf@gmx.us> <87zj8oqqtz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87386eywus.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r3tydswi.fsf@gmx.us> <87iof9bw3e.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLDSE-00074b-V8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:14:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLDSA-0000V6-WC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:14:26 -0500 Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu ([128.2.157.37]:43679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLDSA-0000V0-Sh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:14:22 -0500 In-reply-to: <87iof9bw3e.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > Ok, sorry I didn't check the natbib manual carefully. AFAIK you get > numbers with biblatex without any author-year options so: > > \cite{k}, \parencite{k} =E2=86=92 [Num] > \textcite{k} =E2=86=92 A [Num] > > Is this similar to \numcite? From natbib is seems to be intended for > people who use author-year, but still wants numbers. Is that correct? I don't think so. It is just the number that the citation has in the bibliography, not in brackets or parens, and usually not superscripted. We use it to get something like this in the exported document: "This is seen in Ref. 9" With the other commands you get something like: "This is seen in Ref. [9]" or if you have a superscripted style: "This is seen in Ref. ^9" > > =E2=80=94Rasmus -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu