From: John Kitchin <email@example.com>
To: Bruce D'Arcus <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: CHARPENTIER Emmanuel <email@example.com>,
Subject: Re: should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:54:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
That doesn't seem consistent with other ways that file-local keywords
are used though, and it would lead (for me anyway) to citing unintended
references (and including unintended bib files in the export) if there is
only one bibliography file that should be used for a document.
Maybe a reasonable compromise is something like
#+bibliography: :local t
which could indicate not to use the global variable.
Bruce D'Arcus <email@example.com> writes:
> Yes, you're right Emmanuel.
> I guess this goes back to my file type/extension issue then.
> I do expect this to be a non-issue in time though, as related packages
> update to fully support all three common input formats.
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:29 PM CHARPENTIER Emmanuel
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > It seems like that should not be the case, i.e. if you define
>> > BIBLIOGRAPHY keywords it means you do not want to use the ones in
>> > org-cite-global-bibliography. Is there a scenario where the union of
>> > those makes sense?
>> Yes indeed: you may have
>> - A library for background issues (e. g. methodology)
>> - A (or several) subject matter-specific library (e. g. a
>> subdiscipline, a method, etc...)
>> - A library specific to the question you are discussing (e. g.
>> results of a bibliographic search specific to your question).
>> The first one is a perfect target for org-cite-global-bibliography. The
>> last one is of course a target for #+BIBLIOGRAPHY ; I'd tend to let the
>> subject matter library as a file-specific #+BIBLIOGRAPHY (my subject
>> matters tend to vary...), but this depends on your field.
>> You may also think of this typology as books, reviews and research
>> papers respectively...
>> Emmanuel Charpentier
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-19 17:29 should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography? CHARPENTIER Emmanuel via General discussions about Org-mode.
2021-07-19 17:40 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-19 17:54 ` John Kitchin [this message]
2021-07-19 18:06 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-19 18:07 ` CHARPENTIER Emmanuel via General discussions about Org-mode.
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-19 16:07 John Kitchin
2021-07-19 16:18 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-20 0:01 ` Vikas Rawal
2021-07-20 0:52 ` Thomas S. Dye
2021-07-20 1:42 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-20 8:03 ` Eric S Fraga
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).