From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martyn Jago Subject: Re: [test] Failure on GNU Emacs 22.3.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2011-05-28 on x60s Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:58:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87ehxlcn8v.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNMuP-00022t-5I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 05:58:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNMuN-0003Ug-TS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 05:58:33 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNMuN-0003Tj-Nn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 05:58:31 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNMuL-0007Bd-6B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:58:29 +0100 Received: from 88-96-171-138.dsl.zen.co.uk ([88.96.171.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:58:28 +0100 Received: from martyn.jago by 88-96-171-138.dsl.zen.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:58:28 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org David Maus writes: > Running the test suit on > > GNU Emacs 22.3.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) of 2011-05-28 on x60s > > currently fails with the backtrace below. > > Somehwere/somehow Babel ends up calling `member' with the second > argument not being a list. In Emacs22 this triggers an error, but not > so in Emacs23 and upwards. > > Devs don't consider this a bug: > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=264 > > Best, > -- David > [...] Hi David I don't actually see this on my continuous test server, although I did see regression on 29th October which appeared to be fixed the same day ( see http://martynjago.co.uk:3333/builds/org-mode_Emacs_22 ). Personally I've pretty much given up even monitoring such things since there seems to be such little appetite by most of the maintainers to test anything, or even to run tests, or monitor test results. From my experience, threads like this tend to go unanswered. Best, Martyn