From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Pluim Subject: Re: Discrepancy between documentation and implementation regarding comments Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:52:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87eeyyy013.fsf@thb.lt> <87ftjd3zba.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87blu1xfjb.fsf@thb.lt> <87tv7s3kw8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iPRvK-0002JZ-Au for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:52:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iPRvJ-0008Tz-2s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:52:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::329]:55836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iPRvI-0008Tl-TX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:52:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id g24so2654940wmh.5 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:52:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tv7s3kw8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:16:55 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Thibault Polge Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:16:55 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou said: Nicolas> Hello, Nicolas> Thibault Polge writes: >> Thanks Nicolas, just a small detail though: unless this is a planned >> (breaking) change, I believe the description you linked should read: >>=20 >> A =E2=80=9Ccomment line=E2=80=9D starts with *zero or more whitespac= e characters, >> followed by* a hash sign, followed by a whitespace character or an e= nd >> of line. Nicolas> True. I fixed that. end of line *is* a whitespace character, but I=CA=BCm not going to argue that. I=CA=BCm going to argue that this doesn=CA=BCt cover the case of a '#= ' at EOB without a newline, hence saying 'zero or more' would be better. (and if it really is *one* whitespace character, that=CA=BCs a breaking change from at least org-9.2.6, which allows zero-or-more). Robert