From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Subject: Re: scheduled item taking time from inactive time stamp
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:38:16 -0600
Message-ID: <m263j5qldj.fsf@fastmail.fm>
References: <547849.78457.qm@web28303.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
	<0576FFE1-09CF-4CF1-8A59-B80C87A8DC24@uva.nl>
	<18846.43978.321051.411022@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LaVaE-0004Oz-8A
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:38:26 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LaVaA-0004MN-MU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:38:23 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35329 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaVa9-0004LY-Nn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:38:21 -0500
Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:37533)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1LaVa9-00032y-6j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:38:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <18846.43978.321051.411022@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S.
	Fraga's message of "Fri\, 20 Feb 2009 13\:10\:34 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Eric,

Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>, Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>
writes:

> Would something like
>
>   * TODO $U %?
>
> still work (or with %t instead of %U obviously)?

I just tried this and it worked for me (i.e., showed up in the agenda).
But I'm sure there are finer points that I'm missing.

Best,
Matt