From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: `f' in agenda view Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCAo-00076r-Dd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:05:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCAn-0007RV-Ek for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:05:10 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCAn-0007RJ-9b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:05:09 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBCAm-00054n-RZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:05:08 +0200 Received: from c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([98.215.105.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:05:08 +0200 Received: from jwiegley by c-98-215-105-167.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:05:08 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Dave Abrahams writes: > It always strikes me as odd that `f' in agenda view moves the item forward > by a day even if that leaves it still in the past. Typically if I have an > overdue item, I just want to schedule it for today or a certain number of > days in the future, and as it stands it's even a bit non-obvious when I've > finally bumped it up to today if it's a few days old. Shouldn't the first > `f' on an overdue item schedule it for today? Just to clarify, by 'f' dave means `org-agenda-date-later'. I believe he's using my keybinding for this command... > I'm happy to hack something locally if the group doesn't agree, but moving > things around in the past seems like such a corner case that I thought maybe > this would be a better default behavior. I agree with Dave here. 'f' on a past-dated item maybe should move it today on the first press, and then into the future on subsequent presses. John