From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: [FR] Archive subtree with parent structure Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 10:29:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ha494rr4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wpvid-0001GJ-Mv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 04:29:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpviY-0007LF-82 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 04:29:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ha494rr4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 28 May 2014 21:39:43 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Florian Lindner , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2014-05-28 21:39, Bastien writes: > Hi Florian, > > Florian Lindner writes: > >> If I also archive AB after that, it gets inserted in the structure which >> is now identical to the structure we started with. > > FR noted, thanks. I'm curious to see if people would really find this > a good option, as I like having my archives stored as flat entries. I would also prefer to have my archives hierarchical, for the following reason. I like to archive projects as a whole thing (with the recorded done tasks and the notes). A flat archiving system prevents me from archiving anything until the project is done, which is problematic for long running projects. Having hierarchical archiving would allow me to trim these projects from their done tasks. Alan