From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch? Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:22:57 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8737fr1vx9.fsf@russet.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccjoY-0003rx-Ig for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:22:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccjoX-0008IT-E4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:22:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8737fr1vx9.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:00:02 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Phillip Lord Cc: Bastien Guerry , Emacs developers , emacs-org list , Kaushal Modi >>>>> "PL" == Phillip Lord writes: PL> The alternative proposal is, essentially, to copy files into the Emacs PL> core build structure and move from there. PL> Reading the discussion reinforces my feeling that the latter is the wrong PL> approach, because it reinforces a distinction between packages on ELPA and PL> packages in core above and beyond the location that they are stored and PL> versioned. I can't see the advantage of doing this. PL> I will probably try to work a little further on my package.el solution, PL> although there seems little enthusiasm for this as the way forward. Correct, I don't want to move forward with the package.el option yet. Just copying files into the core build structure should be very lightweight, and it lets us focus on the ELPA separation first. I believe the package.el coupling is something we can examine at a later date. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2