From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: Feature request: Select links by description [7.4] Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:39:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ipwqvksf.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipwmhqcx.fsf@gnu.org> <8739nqq6ha.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4IjG-0005My-97 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:40:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4IjF-0007fn-4u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:40:14 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4IjE-0007f3-W1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:40:13 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4IjA-0000uk-BN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:40:08 +0200 Received: from 207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com ([207.172.223.249]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:40:08 +0200 Received: from dave by 207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:40:08 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org on Tue Feb 15 2011, Dave Abrahams wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Bastien wrote: >> Dave Abrahams writes: > >> >>> How about just always showing the link as it will be presented to the >>> user first, followed by the raw link?  Then everything will be >>> consistent. >> >> I don't see how it would prevent the problem I've been mentionning: we >> will still have a mix of descriptions and raw links... or maybe I miss >> something? > > If it's really paramount to avoid a mixture, you must hide all > descriptions, which would be a step in the wrong direction for me. > >> I'm willing to improve the display of links, keep brainstorming! > > I'm out of ideas. Leading off with the displayed form of the link is > the best I can do. The best is the enemy of the good and all that... is there any reason this can't be made to work? -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com