Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com> writes:

> Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
>
>> Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> I don't quite understand your code below and what it is supposed to do.
>>>
>>> Drawers are probably better in most cases, but this code lets you use
>>> ':results pp replace' while developing, but converts the fixed-width pp
>>> results into raw results when desired (e.g. in a buffer copy before some
>>> action is taken).
>>
>> OK - I see. But what is the advantage in this approach? Drawer do
>> perfectly what I want, i.e. encapsulating an org structure in a for
>> replacement when re-calculated, inside the drawer they behave like
>> normal org structure (folding, ...) and upon export they are exported as
>> org code would be - or am I missing something?
>
> There are none (for you) then, but it might be useful anyway in some
> situations, at least the results look more like part of the document
> when you care about the looks of the org file too (not only the export
> results). 

True.

Thanks a lot,

Rainer

-- 
Rainer M. Krug
email: Rainer<at>krugs<dot>de
PGP: 0x0F52F982