From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thomas S. Dye" Subject: Re: BeOrg Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:30:56 -1000 Message-ID: References: <87k1x0gnyi.fsf@gmail.com> <877et0m5im.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87373om1p9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <1514931452.4092041.1222235240.37A13EBE@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWWyQ-0000OL-JI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:32:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWWyM-0008Jh-8S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:32:02 -0500 Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.33.93]:52868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWWyM-0008A2-2L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:31:58 -0500 Received: from cmgw3 (unknown [10.0.90.84]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A24C1AB275 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:31:14 -0700 (MST) In-reply-to: <1514931452.4092041.1222235240.37A13EBE@webmail.messagingengine.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Peter Davis Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Aloha all Peter Davis writes: > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018, at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> >> I think you are missing the point. Free software is primarily=20 >> about >> source code (the four definitions). > If we refuse to provide useful information just because it=20 > violates some > purist idea of what is or is not acceptably unencumbered, then=20 > we=E2=80=99re > just denying users potential helpful capabilities that may make=20 > the > difference between using org-mode or abandoning it completely in=20 > favor > of some commercial, cross-platform solution. IIUC, the question is about where to provide this information, not=20 whether or not to provide it. OP asked about putting it in the=20 Org manual and Nicolas has pointed out that the manual is for=20 documenting Org software. Perhaps Worg is a better place to provide information about BeOrg? hth, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com