From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com>
Subject: Re: Using org-babel in other modes?
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:52:30 -0400
Message-ID: <m21uulk6r5.fsf@pluto.luannocracy.com>
References: <m2obxpn8kz.fsf@pluto.luannocracy.com> <8739f1g12k.fsf@norang.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35111)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dave@boostpro.com>) id 1RD46d-00046x-6B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:52:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dave@boostpro.com>) id 1RD46b-0002CR-S4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:52:35 -0400
Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:37198)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dave@boostpro.com>) id 1RD46b-0002CF-Pg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:52:33 -0400
Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so5264524vws.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 17:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8739f1g12k.fsf@norang.ca> (Bernt Hansen's message of "Sun, 09
	Oct 2011 20:08:51 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


on Sun Oct 09 2011, Bernt Hansen <bernt-AT-norang.ca> wrote:

> Is it just a matter of defining the mode to use for some new source?

Sorry, I don't think I understand the question.

> For plantuml I have the following:
> (org-babel-do-load-languages
>  (quote org-babel-load-languages)
>  (quote ((emacs-lisp . t)
> 	 (dot . t)
> 	 (ditaa . t)
> 	 (R . t)
> 	 (python . t)
> 	 (ruby . t)
> 	 (gnuplot . t)
> 	 (clojure . t)
> 	 (sh . t)
> 	 (ledger . t)
> 	 (org . t)
> 	 (plantuml . t)
> 	 (latex . t))))
>
> (add-to-list 'org-src-lang-modes (quote ("plantuml" . fundamental)))
> This enables fundamental-mode when I C-c ' on a plantuml block
> #+begin_src plantuml :file foo.png
>
> #+end_src
> Does that help?

I'm not sure... *looks up org-src-lang-modes* Oh, no I think you
misunderstood me.  I am not trying to add an additional language
recognizer to org-babel.

Markdown is a plaintext document format roughly similar to Org.  What I
want is to modify markdown-mode so that /its/ code blocks, which are
currently recognized by markdown-mode but rendered in one solid face and
without any language-specific editing smarts, behave like org's.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com