From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Mankoff Subject: Re: Babel language "org"? Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:47:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YeQIE-0001sj-09 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:47:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YeQI8-0004e4-Tj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:47:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]:34127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YeQI8-0004dn-PQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:47:24 -0400 Received: by qgfi89 with SMTP id i89so26390303qgf.1 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 08:47:23 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Lawrence Bottorff Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org If it weren't wrapped, it would be exported and not show up in the document text. -k. On 2015-04-04 at 11:41, Lawrence Bottorff wrote: > I'm taking a closer look at Eric Neilsen's "Emacs org-mode examples and > cookbook," specifically the org file Eric sent me. And right off the bat I > see something interesting: > > ** General metadata > > An initial group sets the metadata used in any title pages, headers, > footers, etc. used by the various exporters: > > #+NAME: orgmode-header-metadata > #+BEGIN_SRC org > #+TITLE: Emacs org-mode examples > #+AUTHOR: Eric H. Neilsen, Jr. > #+EMAIL: neilsen@fnal.gov > #+END_SRC > > . . . which shows up in the final html version as just > > #+TITLE: Emacs org-mode examples > #+AUTHOR: Eric H. Neilsen, Jr. > #+EMAIL: neilsen@fnal.gov > > Why did he use what looks like babel source formatting? What is gained from > having org "code" as literate programming? Any docs talking specifically > about this, best practices? My first guess is he's just using this as an > org-to-html formatting convention, but, again, how much of "org code" > (whatever we call "org code") can I put in babel source containers? > > LB