From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) Subject: Re: [texinfo] Info links Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:26:46 -1000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8flO-0001pL-0l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:41:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8flJ-0003eV-VQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:41:17 -0500 Received: from oproxy13-pub.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.16.30]:37601) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8fXn-0000Cz-Pt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:27:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Leech-Pepin's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:03:49 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jonathan Leech-Pepin Cc: Org-mode Hi Jon, Jonathan Leech-Pepin writes: > Hello Tom, > > On 21 February 2013 15:09, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > >> Aloha all, >> >> This link (which works correctly in the Org mode buffer): >> >> [[info:emacs#Indirect Buffers][GNU Emacs Manual]] >> >> exports to texinfo like this: >> >> @ref{top,GNU Emacs Manual,,emacs#Indirect Buffers,} >> >> when I was hoping to approximate this: >> >> @ref{Indirect Buffers,,,emacs,GNU Emacs Manual} >> >> Is this a bug, or should I be doing something differently? >> >> This was an oversight by me. I only set ':' as the splitter in the path. > I'm not at the machine that has the right SSH key to be able to push > the fix, however if you change the # to : it should export properly (I'll > add # as a marker to split on as well once I'm at the right machine). > > This will also work properly in Org to access the correct node. Yes, the : works fine everywhere. Thanks! All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com