From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jmcbray@carcosa.net (Jason F. McBrayer) Subject: Re: Re: Org-mode 4.69 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:21:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1e1d92fc98145e6b53ca8593e3b4bc3f@science.uva.nl> <6b77785f0c1e452f7a3be9b4b52ddd90@science.uva.nl> <1a5d239e5dac5e568bbbd7187b125efa@science.uva.nl> <1174519698.12401.13.camel@bertrand.carcosa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUP8N-0000CS-Br for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:23:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUP8M-0000Bv-5X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:23:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUP8M-0000Bq-0t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:23:22 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-05.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HUP6X-0004uI-Jt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:21:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu\, 22 Mar 2007 14\:59\:25 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode Carsten Dominik writes: > Thank you very much, but this is a bit tricky, so maybe I should do > this. I'd guess it would be better for you to do it. I had a look at what would be involved, and a working change would touch a lot more places in the file than I thought it would, and I don't feel confident that I'd get it right. > If you send me a complex patch, we need to get your papers with the > FSF first, or I cannot install the fixes into Emacs. I already have > the papers from David and Piotr, so if you plan to contribute code > in the future, maybe we should go ahead and do this. Why don't we wait until I actually contribute something useful ;) > There is one difference. When everything is in one line, I'd expect > C-c C-t to reach these states. When they are in different lines, > you will need C-S-right to get to them. Both ways have their > advantages. I guess for a special state like CANCELED, a separate > sequence would be good, but I can imagine cases where one would > like different ways of saying an entry is done. I'm not sure what would be better. But this reminds me that we need a tty compatibility binding for org-shiftcontrolright and org-shiftcontrolleft. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason F. McBrayer jmcbray@carcosa.net | | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | | is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada |