From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye)
Subject: Re: [new exporter] [latex] #+CAPTION: [short]{long}
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:29:42 -1000
Message-ID: <m1r4oqbk49.fsf@tsdye.com>
References: <87a9vebzvo.fsf@ed.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41672)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1TQJwv-0003Pb-Tf
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:29:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1TQJwr-0002EJ-JD
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:29:53 -0400
Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.55.9]:47070)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>)
	id 1TQJwr-0002D0-8f
	for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:29:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a9vebzvo.fsf@ed.ac.uk> (Myles English's message of "Mon, 22
	Oct 2012 10:49:15 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Myles English <mylesenglish@gmail.com>
Cc: Emacs-orgmode <Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Aloha Myles,

The syntax is different in the new exporter.

#+CAPTION[short]: long

All the best,
Tom

"Myles English" <mylesenglish@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Should it possible to do this yet:
>
> #+CAPTION: [short]{long}
>
> with the new exporter, as it is with the current exporter?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Myles
>
>

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com