From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) Subject: Re: [ANN] ASCII back-end for new export engine Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:29:04 -1000 Message-ID: References: <87pqec4xua.fsf@gmail.com> <87obtvk6j0.fsf@gmail.com> <87obtrel2z.fsf@gmail.com> <8739b2sctn.fsf@gmail.com> <817h0d4lc6.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5stqm9g.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqofs-00034D-3C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqofp-0005JP-5c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:15 -0500 Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.20]:49864) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqofo-0005J2-Us for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y5stqm9g.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:59:39 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org Mode List , Jambunathan K Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Jambunathan K writes: > >>> I have no objection to implement limited numbering in both LaTeX and >>> ASCII back-ends, but I'd like to know if it can be handled consistently >>> in every other major back-end, too. I'm CC-ing Jambunathan to know his >>> opinion about it. >> >> I can support this in ODT exporter. We can make this a feature of the >> new export engine. > > I've now implemented this for e-latex and e-ascii back-ends. > Great! This works nicely for me. >>>> A way to set individual headings as numbered or unnumbered would be >>>> deluxe. Perhaps this is possible, but I haven't found it? >>> >>> It would require to modify Org's syntax (how to tell which headline has >>> to be numbered and which has not?). It is not possible at the moment. >> >> Let us not support this. > > I tend to agree here. This can be obviously discussed on the list, > detail specifications and so on, but I'd rather postpone any real coding > in this area until new exporter is installed in core. Yes, this is not a burning issue. In my experience, use of \section* etc. is not frequent. It is certainly not a reason to keep the new exporter from moving toward the Org mode core. Thanks for making the num: option really useful for LaTeX export. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com