From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) Subject: Re: Meaning of install Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:06:55 -1000 Message-ID: References: <87y5dso30f.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <5650.1363121211@alphaville> <87d2v34vij.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ip4tg5wk.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <877gl8pd7l.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGdig-0007uV-QP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:07:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGdif-0007eb-9K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:07:26 -0400 Received: from oproxy13-pub.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.16.30]:36595) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGdif-0007eV-0u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:07:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877gl8pd7l.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:25:50 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Achim Gratz , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Bastien, Bastien writes: > Hi Thomas, > > tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >>> I would mention "make config" here for a sanity check of the created >>> configuration. >> >> Good idea. Done. > > Oh, I thought it was done in Org's org.texi manual but I understand > this is done in orgmanual.git, right? Yes, that's right. I'm bringing orgmanual.git up-to-date using the git diff magic formula you sent me a week and a half ago and making some edits as I go along. Changes to the installation section began as minor edits, but grew as this thread went on. > Could you make the change in org.texi too? You have the persistence of a good maintainer. I haven't finished editing the other installation sections, so I'm not in a position to repeat my earlier reply to a similar query, which was to export orgmanual! :) I do hope it will be possible in the near future for me to take a larger role in maintaining the Org manual. That is my goal. But for me to do that the manual will need to be in Org, not texi. For purely personal reasons that don't reflect at all on the Org community or the manual, org.texi fills me with horror. If the orgmanual experiment fails then I plan to beat a hasty retreat, lick my wounds, and work happily on other interesting tasks at hand. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com