From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jmcbray@carcosa.net (Jason F. McBrayer) Subject: Re: Re: OT Re: unicorn Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:26:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <49A5BF02.1090400@rk-f.me> <874oyggml6.fsf@gnu.org> <56DD71CD-D7DD-4639-80D1-2888472DA7E8@uva.nl> <87ljrru3vc.fsf@rosslaird.info> <87bpsmxv9p.fsf@rosslaird.info> <74C5F3DA-6395-4555-9862-96CA12F699F0@uva.nl> <877i3axoup.fsf@rosslaird.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ldlgh-00078z-HY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:26:35 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ldlgg-00077z-0H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:26:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53627 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ldlgf-00077p-KF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:26:33 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123]:64771) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ldlgf-0007xi-CS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:26:33 -0500 Received: from bertrand.carcosa.net ([24.168.211.49]) by cdptpa-omta06.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090301132629.BJDN3201.cdptpa-omta06.mail.rr.com@bertrand.carcosa.net> for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 13:26:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <877i3axoup.fsf@rosslaird.info> (Ross A. Laird's message of "Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:56:14 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org ross@rosslaird.info (Ross A. Laird) writes: > So, before the age of Khafre no one seems to have thought to make art > that was specific enough to be identifiable as one individual. Or such art didn't survive because it was made of perishable materials. Or it was specific enough to be identifiable as one individual /by a member of their culture/, but not by us (because it depicted their ceremonial properties, or their tattoos, or their name, or whatever, instead of their face and form). -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason F. McBrayer jmcbray@carcosa.net | | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | | is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada |