From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jmcbray@carcosa.net (Jason F. McBrayer) Subject: Re: Re: ascii export of url part of links possible? Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:43:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20524da70902241218x66b7ee03pc6a2be6e23c66d0c@mail.gmail.com> <7D422D5E-639F-4638-9045-BBD656A495D8@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld7gh-0001ep-Th for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:43:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld7gg-0001dS-RI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:43:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48022 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld7gg-0001dH-MI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:43:54 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.122]:36078) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ld7gg-0003g5-A1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:43:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7D422D5E-639F-4638-9045-BBD656A495D8@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:21:04 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > Hmmm, I see what you mean - but I don't think that is a realistic use > case. If you have an org document, would you then want to go through > ASCII and then markdown for HTML instead of using the direct route? It would be marginally useful for me. I'm using blog software that accepts article titles and bodies in Markdown format. I used to just write the Markdown, but these days I do most of my article drafting in org-mode, and then export to html. Since Markdown files can contain arbitrary html, it's fine with the blog that I do that. But now I have my article files in HTML rather than Markdown, which makes them very marginally more work to search, maintain, and so forth. Of course, I could just keep the org-mode source somewhere, or write a plugin to let the blog handle basic org formatting... > And I think that > > I get 10 times more traffic from [Google] than from > [Yahoo] or [MSN]. > > is still easier to read than > > I get 10 times more traffic from [Google][] than from > [Yahoo][] or [MSN][]. Assuming: > I get 10 times more traffic from [Google][1] than from > [Yahoo][2] or [MSN][3]. That's true; I hadn't realized that Emacs' footnote-mode handled that style of footnote. I was assuming numeric footnotes, at which point there's no further cost to making it Markdown compatible. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason F. McBrayer jmcbray@carcosa.net | | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | | is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada |