From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) Subject: Re: Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ? Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 21:10:01 -1000 Message-ID: References: <4DC8A5C5.4050202@sift.info> <7319.1304996046@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4DC8A9D5.5090504@sift.info> <8460.1305001352@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4DC8C314.7020106@sift.info> <8838.1305003974@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <9389.1305006788@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJh59-0006Gm-Ox for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 03:10:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJh58-0006a3-NV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 03:10:11 -0400 Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.8]:39709) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJh58-0006Zo-Er for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 03:10:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9389.1305006788@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Tue, 10 May 2011 01:53:08 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Org Mode , rpgoldman@sift.info Nick Dokos writes: > Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Robert Goldman wrote: >> >> > Ah. I get it now. But then surely the above IS a bug -- presumably >> > it's not usual for a person to wish their latex export configuration to >> > appear, in verbatim block, in their org-generated latex document! >> > >> >> Perhaps not in most cases, but a tutorial has to do exactly that: how >> else is it going to show the reader what needs to be done? Certainly >> not by omitting the code that the reader is supposed to use. >> > > After Tom's reply, I went and looked at the example and now I get it > too :-) Sorry for being dense before. > > Nick > > Hi Nick, Actually, your diagnosis was exactly right, as usual. The "buggy" example came from a document meant as a tutorial. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com