From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jmcbray@carcosa.net (Jason F. McBrayer) Subject: Re: Windows and emacs Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:15:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <49667310.60102@rk-f.me> <20090108221803.1357637c@newmanfamily.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLLt1-0002mA-Qq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:15:11 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLLt1-0002lx-38 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:15:11 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55620 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLLt0-0002lu-UH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:15:10 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121]:39961) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LLLt0-0001aa-LI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:15:10 -0500 Received: from bertrand.carcosa.net ([24.168.211.49]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090109181505.VEYP17716.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@bertrand.carcosa.net> for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:15:05 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Manish's message of "Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:48:03 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Manish writes: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Mike Newman wrote: > [snip] >> What I use is the EmacsW32 >> (http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/EmacsW32.html). This gives you recent >> snapshot of Emacs 23 (I use the patched version). > > Does tramp work well on it? It works adequately. I recommend using the plink*/pscp* methods rather than the ssh*/scp* methods. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason F. McBrayer jmcbray@carcosa.net | | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | | is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada |